Survivor centric strategies and nimble resilience in the recovery process after a disaster
Joseph O. Prewitt Diaz
This commentary is to share a vision from the other side of a prism of disaster recovery that up to now has been presented to the disaster affected people after Hurricane Sandy. It is mid June 2013, to this day the New York Times, the Daily News and other major newspapers in the area are reporting in the hundreds of thousands people are still living in temporary shelters. The U.S. Congress didn’t approve disaster aid until January 28, 2013 (http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/29/nyregion/congress-gives-final-approval-to-hurricane-sandy-aid.html?_r=0).
Disaster-affected people in New York and New Jersey, have suffered lack of basic needs, severe weather, and support system that were not familiar to them. In addition the attempt to offer assistance for secondary stressors were foreign to them. A mismatch between the people and the way of life in place versus the way the Federal Government has planned the recovery operations has increased the insecurities, distrust and the fear of being uprooted from their place.
The tug between the external organizations with pre-planned programs to assist disaster affected people and the meaning that the disaster affected people are giving to a changing strengths and meaning of place may be serving as a block to the rebuilding of the places within neighborhoods and communities (Noji, 2005). Place is important concept to understand how people recover from a disaster in a large urban center since most research on place has been conducted in urban centers (Giernyn, 2000).
Survivor centric consultation, decision making by the disaster affected people in the re-establishment of place, the use if nimble approaches to foster resilience through psychosocial support techniques (Hobfoll et al. (2007); Prewitt Diaz, 2008b) to address the secondary stressors are the basic strategies needed to resolve the grit lock to services in New York and New Jersey.
Place is the perception in time and place of built and natural space that is constructed through narratives, stories, and networks. Historical, cultural, social, ecological and physicals attributes are torn and re-woven according to the attitudes and feelings of people that find themselves in the eye of the storms, the peripheral turbulence, or who have lost themselves in the winds of despair (Sullivan, Schuster, Kuehn, Doble & Morais; 2009). Place includes leaving and coming back, cultural identity with others in the place, family connections, or this is the only place they know. There is nowhere to go, there is no way out. The multigenerational families, that developed the place, disbanded, the economy has collapsed. The only thing that remains is hope.
Having been displaced the night of Hurricane Sandy meant that the disaster-affected person didn’t know where they were or what was their place. To have no place means that disaster affected people were lost. There may be a lot of nice people trying to keep you calm but deep inside you know your place is gone. What are the next steps ponders the disaster-affected person. There were no words of comfort that could alleviate the feeling of being lost, disappearing, loosing connections, living in constant vigilance and being driven and governed by fear.
Prewitt Diaz & Dayal (2008) found with there work in the 2004 tsunami, that the key to meaning of recovery is found in place. The process of finding place is an inner and outer journey that fosters the capacity to locate place, give it meaning, and solidify the sense of belonging. Place holds the key to new beginnings. Place is the nature of a people joined together by their past and present, joined together by their aspirations for the future. The simplest explanation for what turns a group of people into a place is a shared narrative. Place is both a story and a history (Prewitt Diaz & Dayal 2008).
A nimble vision of resilience permits that homeostasis between built and natural environment in interaction with human beings may be the pathway to re-establish place. Defining as an end goal enhancing resilience provides an opportunity to disaster affected people to examine their place through mapping in its entirety, identifying the important elements of the place that enhance resilience.
Psychosocial support provides a space for disaster-affected people to two specific phases (1) psychological first aid during the emergency phase. Psychological first aid entails basic, non-intrusive pragmatic care with a focus on listening but not forcing talk, assessing needs and concerns, ensuring that basic needs are met, encouraging social support from significant others and protecting from further harm (SPHERE Manual, 2011, p. 335). and (2) trains community workers to provide basic emotional and practical support to the disaster affected people in addressing the challenges of secondary stressors, by activating social networks, community trusted traditional support, and supporting age appropriate centers (SPHERE, 2011, p. 334). The efforts of psychosocial support should be community based in that international guidance suggests: (1) enable community members including marginalized people to strengthen community self-help and social support, (2) as part of early recovery, initiate plans to develop a sustainable community by advocating for basic needs and activating community networks to provide practical support (MHPSS, 2007; SPHERE 2011).
Psychosocial support facilitates the development of social spaces that encourage and sustain a quality of interaction wherein people feel they can touch, shape and be shaped by accessible conversation. These suggest a combination of localness and proximity that helps people to stay in touch. In such places, people feel a sense of voice that reverberates and creates resonance with events and processes that affect their lives. These activities may reduce the feelings of uprootedness, alienation and placelessness (Fullilove;1996).
CRSI (2011) suggests that there are four steps that the community, place or neighborhood has to do to take charge of their own destinies: (1) an understanding of the meaning of resilience for the disaster affected people, (2) a practical measure of resilience in action, (3) simple usable tools and process that will help the disaster affected people to move forward and tangible benefit is that flow from their efforts. Resilience when applied to disaster-affected people is nimble. It is the quality of places that faces, moves, through and bounce back from difficulty, damage, or destructive experience with a spirit that pursues and stays in touch with purposeful life.
This commentary describes how a psychosocial support approach can enhance the communication between those that support a survivor centric approach to recovery and the Government “fit all” methodologies. The paper proposes a systematic approach using place, resilience, and psychosocial support to achieve client centric solutions and develop nimble resilience.
Sources available upon request.